home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1992-03-20 | 8.2 KB | 198 lines | [TEXT/MSWD] |
-
- RURAL AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS:
- Networking for the Future
-
- Economic, education, and health indicators show
- rural America to lag behind its urban neighbors.
- Two forces make its economic prospects even more
- troubling: First, today's global economy forces rural
- communities to compete in the international mar-
- ketplace; second, telecommunication and comput-
- ers are indispensable tools of business, and rural
- communities lag behind metropolitan areas in being
- able to access and use them.
-
- Roads and transportation arteries linking rural
- regions with urban centers were once considered
- vital to sustaining rural life. In the emerging infor-
- mation age, modern telecommunications and in-
- formation technology are just as vital as roads. They
- are the modem roads and byways of commerce.
- Rural development programs must use them fully.
- Yet rural telecommunications and computer sys-
- tems designed solely for business purposes--
- without concern for improving education, health
- care, and social services--will still miss the mark.
-
- Just when modern telecommunication and infor-
- mation technologies are playing an increasingly
- important role in business, the regulatory structure
- that once provided rural areas equal access to them
- is coming unraveled. The breakup of the Bell system
- and the shift toward deregulated services have
- undermined the system of subsidies that once
- supported rural services. If rural areas are not to
- suffer further decline, new concepts and designs for
- rural telecommunication systems must be found.
- OTA believes this to be possible.
-
- Before divestiture of the Bell system, network
- designs and regulatory models were the sole prov-
- ince of AT&T and Federal/State regulators. This is
- no longer the case. Technological innovation and
- regulatory flexibility now allow mixing and match-
- ing of network design and business relationships to
- fit the needs of the users. This is particularly
- important to rural areas, which have been forced in
- the past to accept network designs, services and
- regulations based on a universal design.
-
- Rural communities, with low population density
- and long distances, must overcome the cost of
- bringing in modern telecommunication services.
- The key is to combine the demand for services from
- different users in the community, creating sufficient
- economic clout to justify the deployment of modern
- technologies and services. One might conceive of
- this as a "Rural Area Network" or RAN.
-
- <figure of RAN showing metropole linked to
- communities in which the industries, residences,
- government offices, and schools are part of the
- network.>
-
- A RAN would link many users in a community,
- including small businesses, educational institutions,
- libraries, health services, and government services.
- For many rural communities, this combined de-
- mand would equal that of a modest corporation or
- large business and thus make it economically feasi-
- ble to utilize technologies such as fiber optics. RAN's
- could also become networks within networks by
- linking them statewide through State educational
- and/or State government networks that already
- exist or are planned. (See box)
-
- -----------------------------------------
- Here Is What Rural Area Networks Can Do
-
- --They allow the economic deployment of ad-
- vanced technology to rural areas through econ-
- omies of scale and scope.
-
- --By sharing the needs of business, education,
- health and government, they could foster coopera-
- tion and community ties.
-
- --The broad range of participation among shared
- users would link the technology directly to
- economic and community development strategies.
-
- -- They would overcome limitations of technical
- telecommunications expertise found prevalent in
- rural areas by focusing on the design of one
- system.
-
- --They would induce communication providers to
- be responsive to rural needs as a result of the
- combined market power.
- ------------------------------------------------
-
- A number of obstacles must be overcome to
- develop rural area networks and to integrate them
- into development programs and strategies. Regula-
- tors base their action on conditions of the present
- and have difficulty in projecting the needs for the
- future. They are unaccustomed to considering com-
- munications in the context of economic develop-
- ment and generally oppose proactive policies for
- technology deployment. Regulators focus on the
- needs of individual subscribers on a service-by-
- service basis, and, because of antitrust concerns, are
- uneasy about allowing the collaboration among
- communication vendors and users needed for com-
- prehensive rural development. Federal/State juris-
- dictional conflicts create an uncertain regulatory
- environment that can stifle innovative approaches
- to serving rural needs.
-
- Rural citizens are disadvantaged in using new
- communication technologies for economic develop-
- ment. They lack adequate infrastructure and the
- necessary skills and experience. This contrasts sharply
- with urban areas where there is a critical mass of
- both technology and sophisticated users that stimu-
- lates new applications and expanded use. To over-
- come the rural disadvantage will require a major
- commitment on the part of individuals, businesses,
- educators, libraries, health care providers, and local,
- State, and Federal Governments. Substantial risk is
- involved, but being too cautious could lead to
- failure.
-
- Notwithstanding the opportunities that new com-
- munication and information technologies offer, tech-
- nology alone cannot level the playing field for rural
- areas in meeting the challenges of urban and global
- competitors. Many other barriers to economic devel-
- opment exist that are more crucial and immediate.
- These include social problems such as low educa-
- tional attainment, poverty, and poor health. Solu-
- tions to these problems are difficult because of
- inadequate physical infrastructure and lack of finan-
- cial capital. If economic development is to be
- self-sustaining, these problems must be attacked
- through comprehensive community development
- programs that indude economic development as
- one goal, but attack social problems as well. Com-
- munications technologies may prove key to deliver-
- ing educational, health, and social services to rural
- communities, and may be crucial to stemming
- further economic decline for rural America.
-
- Means must be found to bring together the
- interests and energy of a wide array of institutions
- and individuals to focus on mutual goals through a
- common strategy. The actors must include institu-
- tions (e.g., schools, libraries, and hospitals, commu-
- nications providers (e.g., Bell operating companies,
- independent telephone companies, cable television
- and satellite companies), and agents of change (e.g.,
- regional and local colleges, universities and educa-
- tional institutions, Federal and State Governments,
- and the business community).
-
- Such a comprehensive approach to economic and
- community development may seem threatening to
- entrenched interests. New alliances may threaten
- established government agencies. Communications
- providers may fear that efforts to pool the demand
- of users might lead to bypassing the existing
- communications systems. The cooperation required
- for rural economic and community development
- based on a shared communication network (RAN)
- will not occur unless petty jealousies are set aside for
- a common vision and a spirit of cooperation.
-
- If this is to happen, the Federal Government must
- provide leadership backed up by organizational and
- financial resources to see it through. While the Rural
- Development Act is a step in the right direction, the
- Federal Government could contribute to its success
- by taking a more active and visionary approach in
- the future.
-
- Copies of the report for non-congressional use can be ordered
- from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
- Printing Office,Washington, DC 20402-9325 (202) 783-3238.
- The GPO stock number for the OTA report, "Rural America at
- the Crossroads: Networking for the Future," is 052-003-01228-
- 6. The price is $9.50. The GPO stock number for the summary
- is 052-003-01230-8. The price is $2.00.
-
- For further information contact OTA's Publications Office.
- Address: OTA, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC 20510-8025
- (202) 2248996.
-
-
-